Thomas M. Sullivan v Troser Management, Inc.
Annotate this Case
Sullivan v Troser Mgt., Inc.
2006 NY Slip Op 04745 [30 AD3d 1118]
June 9, 2006
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, August 23, 2006
Thomas M. Sullivan, Appellant, v Troser Management, Inc., Respondent.
Thomas M. Sullivan, Appellant, v Troser Management, Inc., Respondent.
—[*1]Motion for stay denied. Memorandum: Because appellant can obtain an automatic stay (see CPLR 5519 [a] [4], [5]), a discretionary stay is not available pursuant to CPLR 5519 (c) (see Kightlinger v Kightlinger, 231 AD2d 969 [1996]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Gorski, JJ.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
