People v Juan Martinez-Diaz

Annotate this Case
People v Martinez-Diaz 2006 NY Slip Op 04694 [30 AD3d 1104] June 9, 2006 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, August 23, 2006

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Juan Martinez-Diaz, Appellant.

—[*1]Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Ronald H. Tills, A.J.), rendered October 20, 2004. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree (Penal Law § 220.06 [5]), defendant contends that he did not validly waive his right to appeal. We reject that contention (see generally People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 280 [1992]). Contrary to the further contention of defendant, his general waiver of the right to appeal encompasses his present challenge to Supreme Court's suppression ruling (see People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831, 833 [1999]; People v King, 27 AD3d 1160 [2006]). Present—Gorski, J.P., Martoche, Green, Pine and Hayes, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.