Scott Peterman v George Pataki

Annotate this Case
Peterman v Pataki 2005 NY Slip Op 07164 [21 AD3d 1387] September 30, 2005 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, November 16, 2005

Scott Peterman et al., Respondents, v George Pataki, as Governor of the State of New York et al., Respondents. Oneida Indian Nation of New York et al., Appellants. (Appeal No. 1.)

—[*1]Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (James W. McCarthy, A.J.), entered August 25, 2004. The judgment, insofar as appealed from, denied the motion of Oneida Indian Nation of New York and Ray Halbritter to dismiss the third amended complaint upon the grounds of failure to join an indispensable party and lack of a justiciable controversy.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Gorski, Smith and Lawton, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.