Matter of Marilyn A. Kelley v Martin D. Kelley
Annotate this Case
Matter of Kelley v Kelley
2005 NY Slip Op 07091 [21 AD3d 1443]
Decided on September 30, 2005
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on September 30, 2005
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, J.P., MARTOCHE, PINE, AND HAYES, JJ.
1023 CAF 05-00704
[*1]MATTER OF MARILYN A. KELLEY, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, ORDER
v
MARTIN D. KELLEY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Onondaga County (Martha Walsh Hood, J.), entered June 1, 2004 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4. The order denied petitioner's objections to an order of the Support Magistrate dated April 13, 2004.
MICHELE R. FELICE, SYRACUSE, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
ROBERT A. DURR LAW OFFICE, SYRACUSE (ANDREA G. PERRY OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: September 30, 2005
JoAnn M. Wahl
Clerk of the Court
Decided on September 30, 2005
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, J.P., MARTOCHE, PINE, AND HAYES, JJ.
1023 CAF 05-00704
[*1]MATTER OF MARILYN A. KELLEY, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, ORDER
v
MARTIN D. KELLEY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Onondaga County (Martha Walsh Hood, J.), entered June 1, 2004 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4. The order denied petitioner's objections to an order of the Support Magistrate dated April 13, 2004.
MICHELE R. FELICE, SYRACUSE, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
ROBERT A. DURR LAW OFFICE, SYRACUSE (ANDREA G. PERRY OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: September 30, 2005
JoAnn M. Wahl
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
