Matter of Mark Osmundson v Helen Held-Cummings

Annotate this Case
Matter of Osmundson v Held-Cummings 2005 NY Slip Op 05665 [20 AD3d 922] July 1, 2005 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, September 21, 2005

In the Matter of Mark Osmundson, Appellant, v Helen Held-Cummings, Respondent.

—[*1]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (Bernadette T. Romano, J.), entered September 22, 2003 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order dismissed the petition.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner contends that Family Court erred in dismissing his petition seeking modification of two visitation orders with respect to one of his daughters. That daughter is now 18 years of age, however, and thus the appeal must be dismissed as moot. "The right to visitation is an incident of custody and is . . . extinguished when a child reaches the age of majority" (People ex rel. Minardi v Cesnavicius, 208 AD2d 663, 664 [1994]; see Domestic Relations Law § 2; see also Anastasia v Anastasia, 100 AD2d 740 [1984]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Pine and Lawton, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.