Marianne Schmitt v George S. Paul
Annotate this Case
Schmitt v Paul
2005 NY Slip Op 04882 [19 AD3d 1186]
Decided on June 10, 2005
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on June 10, 2005
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: HURLBUTT, J.P., SCUDDER, KEHOE, GORSKI, AND HAYES, JJ.
791 CA 04-02597
[*1]MARIANNE SCHMITT, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, ORDER
v
GEORGE S. PAUL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Alex R. Renzi, A.J.), entered July 16, 2004. The order granted plaintiff judgment against defendant, directed defendant to pay child support and maintenance arrears and denied defendant's cross motion to vacate a Family Court order.
GOULD, PECK & METZLER LLP, ROCHESTER (ERIC J. METZLER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
LA FAY, BYRNE & LA FAY, P.C., ROCHESTER (ANTHONY P. LA FAY OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed with costs.
Entered: June 10, 2005
JoAnn M. Wahl
Clerk of the Court
Decided on June 10, 2005
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: HURLBUTT, J.P., SCUDDER, KEHOE, GORSKI, AND HAYES, JJ.
791 CA 04-02597
[*1]MARIANNE SCHMITT, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, ORDER
v
GEORGE S. PAUL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Alex R. Renzi, A.J.), entered July 16, 2004. The order granted plaintiff judgment against defendant, directed defendant to pay child support and maintenance arrears and denied defendant's cross motion to vacate a Family Court order.
GOULD, PECK & METZLER LLP, ROCHESTER (ERIC J. METZLER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
LA FAY, BYRNE & LA FAY, P.C., ROCHESTER (ANTHONY P. LA FAY OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed with costs.
Entered: June 10, 2005
JoAnn M. Wahl
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
