Clara Czerski v Rocco Clark
Annotate this Case
Czerski v Clark
2003 NY Slip Op 20324 [2 AD3d 1491]
Decided on December 31, 2003
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on December 31, 2003
MOTION NO. (1178/03) CA 03-00262.
[*1]CLARA CZERSKI AND FELIX CZERSKI, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v
ROCCO CLARK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND CITY OF ROME, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Motion for reargument or, in the alternative, leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied.
PRESENT: HURLBUTT, J.P., SCUDDER, KEHOE, GORSKI, AND LAWTON, JJ. (Filed Dec. 31, 2003.)
Decided on December 31, 2003
MOTION NO. (1178/03) CA 03-00262.
[*1]CLARA CZERSKI AND FELIX CZERSKI, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v
ROCCO CLARK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND CITY OF ROME, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Motion for reargument or, in the alternative, leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied.
PRESENT: HURLBUTT, J.P., SCUDDER, KEHOE, GORSKI, AND LAWTON, JJ. (Filed Dec. 31, 2003.)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
