Chiacchia & Fleming v Eusebio L. Guerra
Annotate this Case
Chiacchia & Fleming v Guerra
2003 NY Slip Op 20317 [2 AD3d 1491]
Decided on December 31, 2003
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on December 31, 2003
MOTION NO. (1043/03) CA 03-00521.
[*1]CHIACCHIA & FLEMING, LLP, AS SPECIAL COUNSEL TO THE TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY ON BEHALF OF THOMAS M. QUINN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v
EUSEBIO L. GUERRA, TRAC LEASE, ALSO KNOWN AS ALCO, MORE FAVOR TRUCKING, AND YANG MING, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Motion for reargument or, in the alternative, leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied.
PRESENT: PINE, J.P., HURLBUTT, SCUDDER, AND HAYES, JJ. (Filed Dec. 31, 2003.)
Decided on December 31, 2003
MOTION NO. (1043/03) CA 03-00521.
[*1]CHIACCHIA & FLEMING, LLP, AS SPECIAL COUNSEL TO THE TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY ON BEHALF OF THOMAS M. QUINN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v
EUSEBIO L. GUERRA, TRAC LEASE, ALSO KNOWN AS ALCO, MORE FAVOR TRUCKING, AND YANG MING, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Motion for reargument or, in the alternative, leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied.
PRESENT: PINE, J.P., HURLBUTT, SCUDDER, AND HAYES, JJ. (Filed Dec. 31, 2003.)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
