Rudolph L. Reed v City of Syracuse

Annotate this Case
Reed v City of Syracuse 2003 NY Slip Op 20316 [2 AD3d 1491] Decided on December 31, 2003 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 31, 2003
MOTION NOS. (1014-1015/03) CA 03-00020.

[*1]RUDOLPH L. REED, PLAINTIFF,

v

CITY OF SYRACUSE, DEFENDANT. CITY OF SYRACUSE, THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF, DAVID A. HUDSON, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT. DAVID A. HUDSON, SECOND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, RUDOLPH L. REED, DOUGLAS R. DESTRY AND/OR COUNTY OF ONONDAGA, SECOND THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND CITY OF SYRACUSE, SECOND THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 1.) CA 03-00021.




RUDOLPH L. REED, PLAINTIFF, V CITY OF SYRACUSE, DEFENDANT. CITY OF SYRACUSE, THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF, V DAVID A. HUDSON, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT. DAVID A. HUDSON, SECOND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF, V RUDOLPH L. REED, DOUGLAS R. DESTRY AND/OR COUNTY OF ONONDAGA, SECOND THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND CITY OF SYRACUSE, SECOND THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.) Motion for reargument or, in the alternative, leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied.
PRESENT: GREEN, J.P., WISNER, GORSKI, AND LAWTON, JJ. (Filed Dec. 31, 2003.)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.