People v Brian P. Cass

Annotate this Case
People v Cass 2003 NY Slip Op 18718 [1 AD3d 1025] November 21, 2003 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 28, 2004

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Brian P. Cass, Appellant.

— Appeal from a judgment of Oneida County Court (Donalty, J.), entered November 16, 2001, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of burglary in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of burglary in the second degree (Penal Law § 140.25 [2]), defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. That contention does not survive his guilty plea inasmuch as "[t]here is no showing that the plea bargaining process was infected by any alleged ineffective assistance or that defendant entered the plea because of his attorney['s] poor performance" (People v Burke, 256 AD2d 1244, 1244 [1998], lv denied 93 NY2d 851 [1999]). We further conclude that County Court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's request for an adjournment of sentencing for the purpose of retaining a new attorney (see People v Kelly, 219 AD2d 676 [1995], lv denied 87 NY2d 847 [1995]; People v De Gaspard, 170 AD2d 835, 838 [1991], lv denied 77 NY2d 994 [1991]). Present—Wisner, J.P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.