Thomas Brade v Carlisle Auto Sales

Annotate this Case
Brade v Carlisle Auto Sales 2003 NY Slip Op 18691 [1 AD3d 1065] Decided on November 21, 2003 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 21, 2003
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., GREEN, SCUDDER, KEHOE, AND HAYES, JJ.
1335 CA 03-00932

[*1]THOMAS BRADE AND PATRICIA BRADE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, ORDER

v

CARLISLE AUTO SALES, INC., AND LONG BEACH ACCEPTANCE CORP., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.


Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Genesee County (Punch, J.), entered September 23, 2002, which denied plaintiffs' cross motion for summary judgment and granted defendants' motion and cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.


LAW OFFICES OF RANDOLPH P. ZICKL, BATAVIA, (RANDOLPH P. ZICKL OF COUNSEL) FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.
WOODS OVIATT GILMAN LLP, ROCHESTER (LORISA D'ANGELO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT CARLISLE AUTO SALES, INC.
MC NAMEE, LOCHNER, TITUS & WILLIAMS, P.C., ALBANY (FRANCIS J. SMITH OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT LONG BEACH ACCEPTANCE CORP.


It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: November 21, 2003JoAnn M. Wahl
Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.