Matter of Vincent Zito v Brion D. Travis
Annotate this Case
Matter of Zito v Travis
2003 NY Slip Op 18681 [1 AD3d 1062]
Decided on November 21, 2003
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on November 21, 2003
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PINE, J.P., HURLBUTT, KEHOE, LAWTON, AND HAYES, JJ.
1325 CA 03-00847
[*1]MATTER OF VINCENT ZITO, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, ORDER
v
BRION D. TRAVIS, CHAIRMAN, NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF PAROLE, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of Supreme Court, Oneida County (Ringrose, J.), entered September 10, 2002, which dismissed the CPLR article 78 petition.
VICTOR KNAPP, KEW GARDENS, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
ELIOT SPITZER, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (EVELYN M. TENENBAUM OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of settlement signed by the attorneys for the parties on June 11, 2003,
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.
Entered: November 21, 2003JoAnn M. Wahl
Clerk of the Court
Decided on November 21, 2003
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PINE, J.P., HURLBUTT, KEHOE, LAWTON, AND HAYES, JJ.
1325 CA 03-00847
[*1]MATTER OF VINCENT ZITO, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, ORDER
v
BRION D. TRAVIS, CHAIRMAN, NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF PAROLE, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of Supreme Court, Oneida County (Ringrose, J.), entered September 10, 2002, which dismissed the CPLR article 78 petition.
VICTOR KNAPP, KEW GARDENS, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
ELIOT SPITZER, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (EVELYN M. TENENBAUM OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of settlement signed by the attorneys for the parties on June 11, 2003,
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.
Entered: November 21, 2003JoAnn M. Wahl
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
