Matter of Sami v Rosado
Annotate this CaseDecided and Entered: October 03, 2023
Before: Oing, J.P., Friedman, Kennedy, Shulman, Pitt-Burke, JJ.
Index No. 151262/19 Appeal No. 706 Case No. 2023-02124
[*1]In re Ishrat Sami, Petitioner,
v
Hon. Mary . Rosado etc., Respondent.
Ishrat Sami, petitioner pro se.
Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Melissa Ysaguirre of counsel), for respondent.
The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,
Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,
It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: October 3, 2023
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.