Matter of CUCS HDFC v Aymes
Annotate this CaseDecided and Entered: October 06, 2022
Before: Renwick, J.P., Oing, González, Mendez, JJ.
Index No. 159303/18 Appeal No. 16373 Case No. 2021-02073
[*1]In the Matter of CUCS HDFC et al., Petitioners-Respondents,
v
Clifford S. Aymes, Respondent-Appellant.
Clifford Aymes, appellant pro se.
Henry H. Korn, PLLC, New York (Henry H. Korn of counsel), for respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Melissa A. Crane, J.), entered on or about April 14, 2021, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, indicated that the order disposed of the proceeding, unanimously reversed, on the facts, without costs, to delete that indication, and remanding for further proceedings on the counterclaim.
The order appealed from should not have indicated that it disposed of this proceeding because there has been no final determination on respondent's
counterclaim.THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: October 6, 2022
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.