People v Dandridge

Annotate this Case
People v Dandridge 2022 NY Slip Op 03994 Decided on June 21, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: June 21, 2022
Before: Gische, J.P., Friedman, González, Rodriguez, Pitt, JJ.
Ind. No. 2442/18 Appeal No. 16168 Case No. 2019-1869, 2019-02189

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Carl Dandridge, Defendant-Appellant.



Janet E. Sabel, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Naila S. Siddiqui of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Reva Grace Phillips of counsel), for respondent.



An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Laurence Busching, J.), rendered January 16, 2019,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: June 21, 2022

Counsel for appellant is referred to

§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate Division,

First Department.



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.