People v Ahmed

Annotate this Case
People v Ahmed 2022 NY Slip Op 03977 Decided on June 16, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: June 16, 2022
Before: Acosta, P.J., Kapnick, Friedman, Mendez, Higgitt, JJ.
Ind No. 1132/16 Appeal No. 16141 Case No. 2018-4541

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Omar Ahmed, Defendant-Appellant.



Janet E. Sabel, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Harold V. Ferguson, Jr. of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Christopher Michael Pederson of counsel), for respondent.



Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert A. Neary, J.), rendered April 4, 2018, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of two years, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of vacating the sentence and remanding the matter for resentencing, including a youthful offender determination, and otherwise affirmed.

As the People concede, defendant is entitled to an express youthful offender determination pursuant to People v Rudolph (21 NY3d 497 [2013]). Because we are ordering a resentencing, we decline to reach the issue of defendant's request for waiver of surcharges and fees pursuant to CPL 420.35(2-a). This issue should be addressed at

the resentencing proceeding (see People v Lugo, 194 AD3d 495 [1st Dept 2021]). THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: June 16, 2022



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.