P.D. v LaCour-Gayet

Annotate this Case
P.D. v LaCour-Gayet 2021 NY Slip Op 03260 Decided on May 20, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: May 20, 2021
Before: Renwick, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Mazzarelli, Mendez, JJ.
Index No. 20207/13E Appeal No. 13897&M-1329 Case No. 2020-03680

[*1]P.D., an Infant by His Mother and Natural Guardian, Tynecca Velez, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents-Appellants,

v

Francois LaCour-Gayet, M.D., Defendant, Montefiore Medical Center, Defendant-Appellant-Respondent.



Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker, LLP, White Plains (Alan Friedberg of counsel), for appellant-respondent.

Jonah Grossman, Jamaica (Lawrence B. Lame of counsel), for respondents-appellants.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Doris M. Gonzalez, J.), entered on or about May 8, 2020, which granted defendant Montefiore Medical Center's motion to set aside the verdict awarding plaintiff $1 million for past pain and suffering and $1 million over 41 years for future pain and suffering to the extent of ordering a new trial on damages unless plaintiff stipulated to a reduction of the awards for past and future pain and suffering to $150,000 and $450,000, respectively, unanimously modified, on the facts, to further reduce the award for future pain and suffering to $100,000, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The award for future pain and suffering deviates materially from what would be reasonable compensation (see CPLR 5501[c]).

In view of this finding, we need not reach the remaining arguments.

M-1329 - P.D., an infant by his mother and natural guardian, Tynecca Velez v Francois LaCour- Gayet, M.D.

Motion to strike Points A-N of plaintiff's reply brief as improper surreply granted.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: May 20, 2021



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.