People v Lee
Annotate this CaseDecided and Entered: March 25, 2021
Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Kern, Moulton, Shulman, JJ.
Ind No. 3299/16 Appeal No. 13439 Case No. 2019-387
[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Ersel Lee, Defendant-Appellant.
Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Brittany N. Francis of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Jonathon Krois of counsel), for respondent.
An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Abraham Clott, J.), rendered June 15, 2017,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: March 25, 2021
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate Division,
First Department.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.