People v Medina

People v Medina 2020 NY Slip Op 07680 Decided on December 17, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: December 17, 2020
Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Gesmer, Kern, Oing, Moulton, JJ.
Ind No. 8257/93 8257/93 Appeal No. 12670 Case No. 2018-04343

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Jose Medina, Defendant-Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Molly Schindler of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Christopher Michael Pederson of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Raymond L. Bruce, J.), entered on or about December 7, 2018, which adjudicated defendant a level two sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court providently exercised its discretion in declining to grant a downward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841, 861 [2014]). The mitigating factors cited by defendant were adequately accounted for by the risk assessment instrument, or were outweighed by the seriousness of the underlying offense against a young child. In particular, defendant failed to demonstrate that his age and health problems would reduce, to the point of warranting a downward departure, his likelihood of reoffending against young children (see e.g. People v Collazo, 179 AD3d 1103, 1104 [2d Dept 2020] lv denied 35 NY3d 909 [2020]). We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining arguments.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: December 17, 2020