Nationwide Affinity Ins. Co. of Am. v Thomas

Annotate this Case
Nationwide Affinity Ins. Co. of Am. v Thomas 2020 NY Slip Op 02258 Decided on April 9, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on April 9, 2020
Friedman, J.P., Kapnick, Webber, González, JJ.
11377 157816/16

[*1] Nationwide Affinity Insurance Company of America, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v

James Thomas, et al., Defendants-Appellants.



The Rybak Firm, PLLC, Brooklyn (Karina Barska of counsel), for appellants.

Hollander Legal Group, P.C., Melville (Allan S. Hollander of counsel), for respondent.



Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Gerald Lebovits, J.), entered February 19, 2019, granting Nationwide's motion for summary judgment to the extent of declaring that plaintiff was not obligated to provide coverage under the subject insurance policy by virtue of the claimants' failures to appear for examinations under oath, unanimously affirmed, without costs. The court properly granted summary judgment for a declaration of no coverage on the obligation by plaintiff to reimburse the healthcare provider defendants-appellants for their treatment of the claims of the claimant defendants as they failed to appear for timely and properly noticed EUOs, which constitutes a breach of a condition precedent, vitiating coverage.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: APRIL 9, 2020

CLERK



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.