People v Pimentel

Annotate this Case
People v Pimentel 2020 NY Slip Op 02177 Decided on April 2, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on April 2, 2020
Renwick, J.P., Richter, Mazzarelli, Singh, JJ.
11342B 578/14 3091/14 4337/16 11342A 11342

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Cesar Pimentel, Defendant-Appellant.



Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (David J. Klem of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Noreen M. Stackhouse of counsel), for respondent.



An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald Zweibel, J.), rendered January 29, 2015 and February 7, 2017,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentences not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: APRIL 2, 2020

CLERK

Counsel for appellant is referred to

§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate

Division, First Department.



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.