Matter of Annette R. v Dakiem E.D.
Annotate this CaseDecided on March 12, 2020
Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Singh, Moulton, González, JJ.
11252 -17/18A
[*1] In re Annette R., Petitioner-Respondent,
v
Dakiem E.D., Respondent-Appellant.
Law Office of Lewis S. Calderon, Jamaica (Lewis S. Calderon of counsel), for appellant.
Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, New York (Sushila Rao Penrapati of counsel), for respondent.
Kenneth M. Tuccillo, Hastings on Hudson, attorney for the child.
Order, Family Court, New York County (Stephanie Schwartz, Referee), entered on or about April 22, 2019, which denied respondent father's motion to disqualify petitioner mother's counsel, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The Referee providently exercised her discretion in denying respondent's motion to disqualify petitioner's counsel. There was no evidence that petitioner's counsel spoke with or interacted with the child regarding matters related to the pending litigation (see Matter of Madris v Oliviera, 97 AD3d 823,
825 [2d Dept 2012]; Rules of Professional Conduct [22 NYCRR 1200.0] rule 4.2).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: MARCH 12, 2020
CLERK
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.