People v Ramirez

Annotate this Case
People v Ramirez 2019 NY Slip Op 01330 Decided on February 21, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on February 21, 2019
Friedman, J.P., Gische, Kapnick, Gesmer, Kern, JJ.
8483 1381/14

[*1]The People of the State of New York Respondent,

v

Yunnel Ramirez, Defendant-Appellant.



David K. Bertan, Bronx, for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Kristian D. Amundsen of counsel), for respondent.



Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph J. Dawson, J.), rendered July 15, 2015, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second and third degrees and resisting arrest, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of five years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. Defendant's suspicious behavior, including moving a metal object from his waistband to the crotch area of his pants, gave the police a founded suspicion of criminality justifying a common-law inquiry, and "[a]s a result of defendant's flight upon the approach of the officers, and the additional suspicion engendered by it, the evidence met the level of reasonable suspicion, justifying pursuit" (People v Pines, 281 AD2d 311, 312 [1st Dept 2001], affd 99 NY2d 525 [2002]).

The verdict was supported by legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-49 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury's credibility determinations, including its evaluation of the plausibility of the police account of the incident.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: FEBRUARY 21, 2019

CLERK



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.