Matter of Mears v Bartley
Annotate this Casemem
ad1
Matter of Mears v Bartley
2019
ny
01190
8445 4854/03 -6074
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the printed Official Reports.
Decided on February 19, 2019
Richter, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Kapnick, Gesmer, Oing, JJ.
8445 4854/03 -6074
[*1]In re Steven Mears
Hon. A. Kirke Bartley, et al.,
Respondents,
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr.,
Non-party respondent.
Steven Mears, petitioner pro se.
Barbara D. Underwood, Attorney General, New York (Charles F. Sanders of counsel), for respondents.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Valerie Figueredo of
The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,
Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,
It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED:
CLERK
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.