CWCapital Cobalt VR Ltd. v CWCapital Invs. LLC

Annotate this Case
CWCapital Cobalt VR Ltd. v CWCapital Invs. LLC 2019 NY Slip Op 00408 Decided on January 22, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on January 22, 2019
Sweeny, J.P., Richter, Tom, Kern, Singh, JJ.
8189N 653277/18

[*1] CWCapital Cobalt VR Ltd., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

CWCapital Investments LLC, et al., Defendants-Respondents, CWFS-Reds, LLC, Defendant.



Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York (Kathleen M. Sullivan of counsel), for appellant.

Venable LLP, New York (Konstantina A. Calabro of counsel), for respondents.



Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Andrea Masley, J.), entered August 2, 2018, which denied plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction to prevent defendants from selling real properties pooled in commercial mortgage-backed securities trusts, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court did not abuse its discretion in denying a preliminary injunction (Nobu Next Door, LLC v Fine Arts Hous., Inc., 4 NY3d 839, 840 [2005]). Plaintiff did not establish a likelihood of success on the merits, because, even without addressing the various questions surrounding plaintiff's authority under the agreements, it did not take the requisite steps to remove and replace respondents as control class representative and special servicer under the indenture and collateral management agreement (CPLR 6301). Moreover, plaintiff has not shown that it will suffer irreparable harm absent injunctive relief, since the alleged harm would be compensable with monetary damages (id.). Finally, a balance of the equities does not weigh in plaintiff's favor (Nobu at 839).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: JANUARY 22, 2019

CLERK



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.