Hodosy v Apotheke, LLC
Annotate this CaseDecided on October 29, 2019
Richter, J.P., Gische, Tom, Gesmer, Moulton, JJ.
10207 161964/15
[*1] Vija Hodosy, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v
Apotheke, LLC, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Norton & Associates, LLC, New York (Michael E. Norton of counsel), for appellants.
The Dweck Law Firm, LLP, New York (Christopher S. Fraser of counsel), for respondent.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Nancy M. Bannon, J.), entered December 24, 2018, in favor of plaintiff in the total sum of $259,570.51, and bringing up for review an order, same court and Justice, entered December 19, 2018, which granted plaintiff's motion to confirm the Special Referee's report and recommendation dated February 14, 2018, and denied defendants' cross motion to vacate a conditional order of preclusion dated November 13, 2017 striking defendants' answer pursuant to CPLR 3126, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Defendants failed to establish a reasonable excuse for their failure to comply with the conditional order's discovery directives or a meritorious defense. Therefore, the court's denial of their motion to vacate was an appropriate exercise of its discretion (see Gibbs v St. Barnabas Hosp., 16 NY3d 74, 80 [2010]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: OCTOBER 29, 2019
CLERK
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.