Matter of Diaz v Bailey

Annotate this Case
Matter of Diaz v Bailey 2018 NY Slip Op 07952 Decided on November 20, 2018 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 20, 2018
Renwick, J.P., Richter, Tom, Kern, Oing, JJ.
7667 453/11 -3402] 154/18

[*1]In re Gilberto Diaz, Petitioner,

v

Patricia J. Bailey, et al., Respondents.



Gilberto Diaz, petitioner pro se.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Stephen J. Kress of counsel), for respondents.



The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,

Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: NOVEMBER 20, 2018

CLERK



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.