Matter of Everett v Montano

Annotate this Case
Matter of Everett v Montano 2018 NY Slip Op 06504 Decided on October 2, 2018 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on October 2, 2018

Renwick, J.P., Gische, Kahn, Kern, Moulton, JJ.

[7223 2364/16 -2458] 151/18



[*1]In re Damen Everett,

Petitioner,

Hon. Armando Montano, JSC,

etc., et al.,

Respondents.



Damen Everett, petitioner pro se.

Barbara D. Underwood, Attorney General, New York (Angel M. Guardiola, II of counsel), for Hon. Armando Montano, respondent.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Kyle R. Silverstein of counsel), for District Attorney, respondent.

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,

Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.