Matter of Williams v Fabrizio
Annotate this CaseDecided on June 12, 2018
Richter, J.P., Webber, Kahn, Kern, Oing, JJ.
6857 66/13 -1059] 136/18
[*1]In re Kaseem Williams, Petitioner,
v
Hon. Ralph Fabrizio, etc., et al., Respondents.
Kaseem Williams, appellant pro se.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Angel M. Guardiola II of counsel), for Hon. Ralph Fabrizio, respondent.
Darcel D. Clarke, District Attorney, Bronx (Waleska Suero Garcia of counsel), for Darcel D. Clark, respondent.
The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,
Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,
It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: JUNE 12, 2018
CLERK
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.