Entrada v City of New York

Annotate this Case
Entrada v City of New York 2018 NY Slip Op 03933 Decided on June 5, 2018 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 5, 2018
Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Gische, Mazzarelli, Gesmer, JJ.
6762 306052/12

[*1]Illuminada Entrada, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

The City of New York, Defendant-Respondent.



Rosales Del Rosario, P.C., Flushing (Leo L. Rosales of counsel), for appellant.

Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Barbara Graves-Poller of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ben R. Barbato, J.), entered on or about April 6, 2017, which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law in this action for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff when she slipped and fell on snow and ice on a sidewalk on an overpass of the Cross Bronx Expressway. Defendant submitted evidence showing it did not have actual or constructive notice of the condition. The record also demonstrates that defendant did not have a reasonable amount of time to clear the sidewalk of the icy condition that developed in the six hours from the end of the storm until the accident (see Moss v City of New York, 5 AD3d 312 [1st Dept 2004]).

We have considered plaintiff's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: JUNE 5, 2018

CLERK



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.