Matter of Ramirez v Grasso
Annotate this CaseDecided on April 24, 2018
Sweeny, J.P., Richter, Webber, Gesmer, Moulton, JJ.
6367 1699/17 1812/17 -1473] 140/18 M-911
[*1]In re Jose Joaquin Ramirez, Petitioner,
v
Hon. George Grasso, etc., Respondent.
Jose Joaquin Ramirez, Petitioner pro se.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Angel M. Guardiola II of counsel), for respondent.
The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,
And respondent having cross-moved to dismiss the proceeding,
Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,
It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied, the cross motion granted, and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: APRIL 24, 2018
CLERK
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.