Arkoh v Navarro
Annotate this CaseDecided on April 10, 2018
Renwick, J.P., Mazzarelli, Kahn, Gesmer, Kern, JJ.
6254N 304260/14
[*1] Philip Arkoh, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v
Felix Navarro III, et al., Defendants-Respondents.
Law Offices of Alexander Bespechny, Bronx (Louis Badolato of counsel), for appellant.
Appeal from order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Laura G. Douglas, J.), entered January 6, 2017, which, insofar as appealed from, purportedly granted defendants' motion to compel plaintiff to provide access to his Facebook account, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken by a nonaggrieved party.
A reading of the entire order appealed from makes clear that the motion court denied so much of defendants' motion as sought access to plaintiff's Facebook account. As a result, plaintiff
was not aggrieved by the order, and therefore has no standing to appeal (see CPLR 5511).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: APRIL 10, 2018
CLERK
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.