People v Thioubu

Annotate this Case
People v Thioubu 2018 NY Slip Op 03473 Decided on May 15, 2018 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on May 15, 2018
Renwick, J.P., Mazzarelli, Kahn, Gesmer, Kern, JJ.
6241 1453/13

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Hasim Thioubu, Defendant-Appellant.



Rosemary Herbert, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Lauren Stephens-Davidowitz of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Yan Slavinskiy of counsel), for respondent.



Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. McLaughlin, J.), rendered November 15, 2013, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of conspiracy in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 4 to 12 years and 7 years, respectively, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of reducing the sentence on the weapon conviction to six years, and otherwise affirmed.

Defendant did not make a valid waiver of his right to appeal. In any event, we reject his suppression claim. Defendant was not entitled to a hearing regarding a surveillance videotape (see People v Gee , 99 NY2d 158 [2002]), and his other suppression claims were abandoned or forfeited by his guilty plea.

We find the sentence excessive to the extent indicated.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: MAY 15, 2018

CLERK



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.