Matter of Sherman J. v Betty J.
Annotate this CaseDecided on December 28, 2017
Acosta, P.J., Richter, Mazzarelli, Andrias, Gesmer, JJ.
5281
[*1]In re Sherman J., Petitioner-Appellant,
v
Betty J., Respondent-Respondent.
Larry S. Bachner, New York, for appellant.
Order, Family Court, New York County (J. Machelle Sweeting, J.), entered on or about May 1, 2017, which authorized petitioner to access his former residence on a specified date and time in order to retrieve personal belongings, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Application by petitioner's assigned counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California , 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Saunders , 52 AD2d 833 [1st Dept 1976]). We have reviewed the record and agree with assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on this appeal. In fact, the Family Court's order provided petitioner with the exact relief that he was seeking.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: DECEMBER 28, 2017
CLERK
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.