Ramirez v City of New York
Annotate this CaseDecided on June 8, 2017
Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Andrias, Moskowitz, Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
4189 311198/11
[*1]Juan A. Ramirez, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v
The City of New York, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Daniel Matza-Brown of counsel), for appellants.
Pollack, Pollack, Isaac and DeCicco, New York (Brian J. Isaac of counsel), for respondent.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Faviola Soto, J.), entered December 18, 2015, after a jury trial, in plaintiff's favor, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the complaint dismissed.
There is no evidence that defendants had prior written notice that the curb in Crotona Park North on which plaintiff tripped was "obstructed" by overgrown vegetation (see Administrative Code of City of NY § 7-201[c][2], [c][1]; Monteleone v Incorporated Vil. of Floral Park, 74 NY2d 917 [1989]; Carlo v Town of Babylon, 55 AD3d 769 [2d Dept 2008]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: JUNE 8, 2017
CLERK
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.