People v Habersham

Annotate this Case
People v Habersham 2017 NY Slip Op 06886 Decided on October 3, 2017 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on October 3, 2017
Sweeny, J.P., Moskowitz, Kahn, Gesmer, JJ.
3951/14 4549 4548

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Guinevere Habersham, Defendant-Appellant.



Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Siobhan C. Atkins of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Rebecca Hausner of counsel), for respondent.



An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Gregory Carro, J.), rendered October 28, 2015, as amended February 3, 2016,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.

ENTERED: OCTOBER 3, 2017

CLERK

Counsel for appellant is referred to

§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate

Division, First Department.



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.