Palma v Douglas

Annotate this Case
Palma v Douglas 2017 NY Slip Op 09247 Decided on December 28, 2017 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 28, 2017
Acosta, P.J., Richter, Mazzarelli, Andrias, Gesmer, JJ.
&em;

[*1] Hugo I. Palma, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

Anthony A. Douglas, et al., Defendants-Respondents.



Law Offices of William Pager, Brooklyn (William Pager of counsel), for appellant.

Law Offices of John Trop, Yonkers (David Holmes of counsel), for respondents.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Fernando Tapia, J.), entered June 9, 2016, which, in this action for personal injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident, denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly denied plaintiff's motion as the evidence, including the parties' conflicting accounts as to how the accident occurred and the police accident report, presents triable issues of fact as to who was at fault for the accident (see e.g. Geralds v Damiano, 128 AD3d 550 [1st Dept 2015]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: DECEMBER 28, 2017

CLERK



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.