Matter of Diaz v Goldberg
Annotate this CaseDecided on December 13, 2016
Tom, J.P., Friedman, Saxe, Feinman, Kahn, JJ.
2466 453/11 -5142
[*1]In re Gilberto Diaz Petitioner,
v
Hon. Arlene Goldberg, etc., Respondent. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., etc Nonparty Respondent.
Gilberto Diaz, petitioner pro se.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Grace Vee of counsel), for Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., respondent.
The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,
Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,
It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
DECEMBER 13, 2016
CLERK
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.