Matter of Scott v Leverett
Annotate this Casemem
ad1
Matter of Scott v Leverett
2016
ny
08028
2348 75/16 -4907] -5394] -5395] -5396
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the printed Official Reports.
Decided on November 29, 2016
Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Saxe, Kapnick, Gesmer, JJ.
2348 75/16 -4907] -5394] -5395] -5396
[*1]In re Robert Scott
Petitioner,
Hon. Ulysses B. Leverett, et al.,
Respondents.
Robert Scott petitioner pro se.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Angel M. Guardiola II of counsel), for Hon. Ulysses B. Leverett, respondent.
Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (E.K. Montcalm of counsel), for Adult Protective Services, respondent.
Northern Manhattan Improvement Corporation Legal Services, New York (Matthew J. Chachére of counsel), for Alan Gary Morley, resopondent.
The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,
Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon, It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: NOVEMBER 29, 2016
CLERK
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.