People v Richmond
Annotate this CaseDecided on October 20, 2016
Mazzarelli, J.P., Acosta, Richter, Kapnick, Gesmer, JJ.
1978 30240/14
[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
David Richmond, Defendant-Appellant.
Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Molly Schindler of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alexander Michaels of counsel), for respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Neil Ross, J.), entered March 4, 2015, which adjudicated defendant a level two sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law article 6-C), unanimously modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of reducing the adjudication from level two to level one, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
The mitigating factors cited by defendant were not adequately taken into account by the guidelines. After considering defendant's arguments, and in the exercise of our discretion, we find that a downward departure to level one is warranted under all the circumstances.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: OCTOBER 20, 2016
CLERK
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.