People v Washington
Annotate this CaseDecided on October 4, 2016
Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Andrias, Webber, Gesmer, JJ.
1795 6056/94
[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Viscount Washington, Defendant-Appellant.
Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Abigail Everett of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Stephen Kress of counsel), for respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael J. Obus, J.), entered on or about March 24, 2015, which adjudicated defendant a level three sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The undisputed serious physical injury inflicted by defendant automatically resulted in an override to risk level three (see People v Howard, 27 NY3d 337, 342 [2016]). The court properly exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]). There were no mitigating factors that were not adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument, and the record does not establish any basis for a downward departure, given the egregiousness of the underlying crime.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: OCTOBER 4, 2016
CLERK
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.