Matter of Wooldridge v Carro

Annotate this Case
Matter of Wooldridge v Carro 2016 NY Slip Op 06265 Decided on September 29, 2016 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on September 29, 2016
Mazzarelli, J.P., Acosta, Saxe, Moskowitz, Gesmer, JJ.
1773 2623/15 -2979

[*1]In re Alex Wooldridge, Petitioner,

v

Hon. Gregory Carro, etc., et al., Respondents.



Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Rachel Black and Allison Lewis of counsel), for petitioner.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Michelle R. Lambert of counsel), for Hon. Gregory Carro, respondent.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Charles Kee of counsel), for New York District Attorney, respondent.



The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,

Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

ENTERED: SEPTEMBER 29, 2016

CLERK



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.