People v Williams

Annotate this Case
People v Williams 2015 NY Slip Op 04396 Decided on May 21, 2015 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on May 21, 2015
Tom, J.P., Friedman, DeGrasse, Richter, Kapnick, JJ.
831/83 15195 15194

[*1] The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Melvin Williams, Defendant-Appellant.



Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Amanda Rolat of counsel), for appellant.

Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (David P. Johnson of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Denis J. Boyle, J.), entered on or about January 14, 2013, which, upon reargument, adhered to a prior order denying defendant's CPL 440.30(1-a) motion for DNA testing, unanimously affirmed.

The People presented detailed affidavits by personnel from the District Attorney's Office, the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner and the Police Department setting forth their diligent but unsuccessful efforts to locate evidence from defendant's 1984 trial, on which defendant sought to have DNA testing performed. This satisfied the People's burden to show that the evidence could no longer be located and was thus no longer available for testing (see People v Pitts, 4 NY3d 303, 311-312 [2005]; People v Garcia, 65 AD3d 932 [1st Dept 2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 907 [2009]). Given these circumstances, we see no reason to remand for an evidentiary hearing or for any other purpose. Defendant does not adequately explain how a hearing would result in discovery of the evidence he seeks.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: MAY 21, 2015

CLERK



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.