Cangro v Reitano

Annotate this Case
Cangro v Reitano 2015 NY Slip Op 06023 Decided on July 9, 2015 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on July 9, 2015
Gonzalez, P.J., Friedman, Renwick, Moskowitz, Clark, JJ.
15671 100381/13

[*1] Jennifer Cangro, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

Gina Marie Reitano, Defendant-Respondent.



Jennifer Cangro, appellant pro se.



Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Louis B. York, J.), entered August 5, 2014, dismissing the complaint, granting defendant a protective order, and awarding a sanction against plaintiff, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In this action, plaintiff raises claims identical to those she raised in a prior action that was dismissed as res judicata (Cangro v Reitano, 92 AD3d 483 [1st Dept 2012], lv denied 20 NY3d 965 [2012]).

The award of sanctions against plaintiff and a protective order in favor of defendant are fully supported by the record (see Levy v Carol Mgt. Group, 260 AD2d 27, 34 [1st Dept 1999]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: JULY 9, 2015

CLERK



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.