Wathne Imports, Ltd. v PRL USA, Inc.
Annotate this CaseDecided on June 18, 2015
Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Friedman, Kapnick, JJ.
15484N 603250/05
[*1] Wathne Imports, Ltd., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v
PRL USA, Inc., et al., Defendants-Respondents.
Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, New York (L. Peter Parcher of counsel), for appellant.
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, New York (Robert I. Steiner of counsel), for respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered January 7, 2015, which granted defendants' motion to strike plaintiff's jury demand, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court properly granted defendants' motion, as the primary relief sought in the complaint — an injunction enjoining defendants from further interference with plaintiff's licensing rights — is equitable in nature, and the claims for damages are "incidental" (Krulwick v Posner , 272 AD2d 160 [1st Dept 2000]).
We have considered plaintiff's remaining arguments, including that defendants should be judicially estopped from arguing that plaintiff is not entitled to a jury trial, and find them unavailing.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: JUNE 18, 2015
CLERK
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.