People v McIntosh

Annotate this Case
People v McIntosh 2015 NY Slip Op 03462 Decided on April 28, 2015 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on April 28, 2015
Gonzalez, P.J., Mazzarelli, Renwick, Gische, JJ.
14945 4443/08

[*1] The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Gary McIntosh, Defendant-Appellant.



Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Jan Hoth of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Allen J. Vickey of counsel), for respondent.



Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Maxwell Wiley, J.), rendered June 30, 2010, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of identity theft in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of one to three years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant is not entitled to relief under People v Peque (22 NY3d 168 [2013]). Initially, we note that defendant has not established that the exception to the preservation requirement set forth in Peque (id. at 182-183) should apply, and we decline to review defendant's unpreserved claim in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we reject it on the merits. By advising defendant that his plea could result in deportation, the court satisfied the basic requirement of Peque (id. at 176).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: APRIL 28, 2015

CLERK



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.