People v Young

Annotate this Case
People v Young 2014 NY Slip Op 02538 Decided on April 15, 2014 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on April 15, 2014
Tom, J.P., Acosta, Freedman, Kapnick, JJ.
12206 386N/12

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Rodney Young, Defendant-Appellant.




Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Jan
Hoth of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Ryan Gee of
counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel P. Conviser, J. at suppression hearing; Roger S. Hayes, J. at plea and sentencing), rendered July 20, 2012, as amended September 4, 2012, convicting defendant, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony drug offender previously convicted of a violent felony, to a term of four years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248 [2006]). Not only did the court separate the right to appeal from the rights automatically forfeited as the result of a guilty plea (compare People v Williams, 59 AD3d 339, 340 [2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 861 [2009]), it expressly stated that by pleading guilty a defendant does not give up the right to appeal. It then explained that, in return for the negotiated plea and sentence, defendant was additionally agreeing to waive his right to appeal, and defendant acknowledged that he understood (see People v Chavez, 84 AD3d 630 [1st Dept 2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 858 [2011]).

This waiver forecloses defendant's suppression claims. As an alternative holding, we also reject them on the merits. Defendant was lawfully arrested pursuant to the fellow officer rule, and the identification was confirmatory.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: APRIL 15, 2014

CLERK

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.