Matter of Soares v Farber
Annotate this Case
Matter of Soares v Farber
2014 NY Slip Op 02238
Decided on April 1, 2014
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on April 1, 2014
Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Moskowitz, Richter, Feinman, JJ.
12109 5819/10
[*1]In re Manuel Soares, [M-758] Petitioner, Hon.
v
Thomas A. Farber, etc., Respondent.
Manuel Soares, petitioner pro se.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Susan
Anspach of counsel), for respondent.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Tracy Conn
of counsel), for respondent.
Decided on April 1, 2014
Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Moskowitz, Richter, Feinman, JJ.
12109 5819/10
[*1]In re Manuel Soares, [M-758] Petitioner, Hon.
v
Thomas A. Farber, etc., Respondent.
Manuel Soares, petitioner pro se.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Susan
Anspach of counsel), for respondent.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Tracy Conn
of counsel), for respondent.
The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,
Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,
It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: APRIL 1, 2014
CLERK
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.