Matter of Rodriguez v Kelly

Annotate this Case
Matter of Rodriguez v Kelly 2013 NY Slip Op 00427 Decided on January 29, 2013 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on January 29, 2013
Andrias, J.P., Sweeny, DeGrasse, Freedman, Richter, JJ.
9090 109088/10

[*1]In re Jefferson Rodriguez, Petitioner,

v

Raymond Kelly, etc., et al., Respondents.




Cronin & Byczek, LLP, Lake Success (Rocco G. Avallone of
counsel), for petitioner.
Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Kristin
M. Helmers of counsel), for respondents.

Determination of respondent Commissioner of the City of New York Department of Finance, dated March 12, 2010, terminating petitioner's employment as a deputy sheriff for the City of New York, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of Supreme Court, New York County [Barbara Jaffe, J.], entered February 9, 2011), dismissed, without costs.

Substantial evidence supports the findings that petitioner falsely reported that he was unable to work from October 2008 to June 2009; that he engaged in unauthorized outside employment; and that he lied under oath when he denied engaging in such outside employment at his workers' compensation hearing. There exists no basis to disturb the credibility determinations of the Administrative Law Judge (see generally Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 443-444 [1987]).

The penalty of termination does not shock our sense of
fairness (see e.g. Matter of Cherry v Horn, 66 AD3d 556 [1st Dept 2009]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: JANUARY 29, 2013

CLERK

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.