Berry v Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP
Annotate this Case
Berry v Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP
2013 NY Slip Op 00293
Decided on January 22, 2013
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on January 22, 2013
Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels, Román, Clark, JJ.
9051 652274/11
[*1]Gregory Berry, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v
Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP, et al., Defendants-Respondents.
Gregory Berry, New York, for appellant.
Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP, New York
(Joseph A. Piesco, Jr. of counsel), for respondents.
Decided on January 22, 2013
Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels, Román, Clark, JJ.
9051 652274/11
[*1]Gregory Berry, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v
Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP, et al., Defendants-Respondents.
Gregory Berry, New York, for appellant.
Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP, New York
(Joseph A. Piesco, Jr. of counsel), for respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered on or about January 13, 2012, which granted defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff's claims are barred by the release and were properly dismissed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: JANUARY 22, 2013
CLERK
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.